Gravipressure Taxonomy
The ECM outcome map distinguishing curvature-like responses, pressure-like responses, and collapse from alignment/orientation conditions.
What the term means
The gravipressure taxonomy classifies what happens when fermion alignment and mediator orientation meet inside the phase-locked scalar geometry. Symmetric matched cases select curvature-like responses, asymmetric cases select pressure-like responses, and symmetric-but-misaligned cases collapse to scalar zero.
The signs in the taxonomy are orientation/alignment signs, not simple claims about negative spin magnitude.
How it relates to the ECM
ECM uses this taxonomy to preserve the spin-2 signature of curvature response while still treating it as an emergent phase-locked regime of the scalar substrate.
The taxonomy is also the template for later pressure language: harmonic pressure and resonance pressure follow similar alignment logic at different scales.
Why it is important to understand
This term matters because it prevents every stressed configuration from being called gravity or every failure from being called pressure.
It gives the site a controlled way to explain when a system curves, when it pushes, and when it cannot sustain the route.
Book context
Book anchors: Chapter 1, Figure 1.13 and Chapter 2, pages 53–55 define the taxonomy with ±λ, spin class, pressure-like outcomes, curvature-like outcomes, and collapse zero.
Read this as ECM vocabulary: it defines how the book uses the term inside its own conservation-first model. The term can overlap with standard physics or mathematics, but this page is explaining the ECM role first so readers do not lose the model-specific meaning.
Related ECM Diagram
This diagram belongs on the Gravipressure Taxonomy page because it is the specific outcome map for curvature-like, pressure-like, and collapse responses.
The takeaway is that the taxonomy is an outcome map. Alignment and mediator orientation decide whether the response is curvature-like, pressure-like, or collapse to scalar zero.